Conspiracy myths began to appear with the modern exercising of power. They are politics\u2019 negative side, their shadow in a sense. The appearance of conspiracy thinking dates to the birth of a socio-political order which is no longer immutable and traditional but subject instead to the transformative activities of the human will. It took shape in \u00adcounter-revolutionary circles soon after the French Revolution: in 1797, the Abb\u00e9 Barruel interpreted those events as the product of a Masonic conspiracy.2<\/sup><\/a><\/span> 2 <\/a> - Pierre-Andr\u00e9 Taguieff, Les Protocoles des Sages de Sion. Faux et usages d\u2019un faux <\/em>(Paris: Fayard, 1987).<\/span> This rhetoric is still visible in today\u2019s far-right wing: in this view, \u00admodernity is the result of a conspiracy and all groups who hold any sort of power, in reality or not, are liable to seeing others fantasize about their influence. These conspiracy theories are tied to history; even if new hidden powers appear (Jews, capitalists, Americans, etc.), the shape of the conspiratorial narrative remains essentially the same. This is the domain of extremists, whether from the right or the left. For several years now, various people who study such phenomena have drawn attention to this renewed \u00adfashion for conspiracy theories and alerted the public. The \u00addistress caused by globalization feeds conspiratorial interpretations: the proliferating anti-globalization (and anti-American) discourses, travelling back and forth between one extreme and the other, often take the form of conspiracy theories and are full of dangers for political thinking. This proliferation concerns those who work in the field, because conspiratorial ideas are loaded with violence: by accrediting a group with a powerful and \u00addisproportionately malign influence, they use a projection mechanism to justify passing to action. Far-right ideologies are typically conspiracy \u00adtheories, with the Jewish-Masonic conspiracy being the best known because it was the model for Nazism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In his book Crowds and Power<\/em>, Elias Canetti uses the memoirs of the Austrian judge Paul Daniel Schreber to establish a parallel between the private madness of the memoirs\u2019 author and the public madness of Adolf Hitler.3<\/sup><\/a><\/span> 3 <\/a> - Elias Canetti, Crowds and Power<\/em>, trans. Carol Stewart (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1984 [1960]).<\/span> The case of this judge was made famous by Sigmund Freud in his analysis of the mechanisms of the projection and \u201creturn of the repressed\u201d typical of paranoid schizophrenia.4<\/sup><\/a><\/span> 4 <\/a> - Sigmund Freud, \u201cPsycho-Analytical Remarks on an Autobiographical Account of a Case of Paranoia (Dementia Paranoides),\u201d The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud<\/em>, Vol. 12, ed. and trans. James Strachey, (London: Hogarth Press\/Institute of Psychoanalysis, 1958), 9-82.<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n The psychiatric metaphor is regularly invoked to understand power in its most extreme or destructive manifestations. The personalities of \u00addictators have made us sensitive to this reality: the fantasy of the \u00adparanoiac, when in power, becomes everyone\u2019s reality, because the \u00adparanoiac is not only someone who fantasizes about persecution but also, when able, really persecutes in return. Paranoid delirium is reversible: those affected project their own faults onto their victims so as to punish them better.<\/p>\n\n\n\n For Canetti, all despots and sovereigns behave in a paranoid \u00admanner. Paranoid delirium is \u201cexactly the model of political power feeding and \u00adbuilding from the masses.\u201d Paranoia, because it is an expression of the madness of power which inhabits all of us, is propagated in groups. Under the leadership of the despot, society as a whole enters into a delirium of \u00adpersecution. It is not a matter of oppression from without, imposed on a free society, but of intrinsic paranoid tendencies which the despot makes real for us. In other words, despots feed off our fears before \u00adpresenting themselves as the solution, and apparently we are stupid enough to submit to them for deliverance. Writers who describe \u00adthemselves as \u201cSchreberians\u201d seek in the Austrian judge\u2019s writings the roots of \u00adproto\u2011Nazism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Gilles Deleuze\u2019s and F\u00e9lix Guattari\u2019s book Anti-Oedipus<\/em>, published in 1972, went a long way towards conveying the message that power was essentially paranoiac. Significantly, their ideas developed in the wake of May 1968. They saw their work as a response to the question posed by the psychoanalyst Wilhelm Reich: how can we account for the fact that the masses wanted fascism?5<\/sup><\/a><\/span> 5 <\/a> - Wilhelm Reich, The Mass Psychology of Fascism<\/em>, trans. Theodore P. Wolfe (New York: Orgone Institute Publications, 1946). <\/span> Or, to use Canetti\u2019s terminology, how can we account for the spread of paranoia from the despot to the masses? These questions are also valid with respect to the \u201cneed for security\u201d seen these past twenty years in Western societies, because we must acknowledge that this is not only the result of September 11 and anti-terrorist media campaigns, even if these gave the issue a degree of intensity it had never before attained.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This perversion of collective desire is what we must explore. According to Deleuze and Guattari, the desire for repression is the result of a \u201csecondary repression.\u201d6<\/sup><\/a><\/span> 6 <\/a> - Gilles Deleuze and F\u00e9lix Guattari, L\u2019Anti-\u0152dipe<\/em>, (Paris: Minuit, 1972), 40.<\/span> When the \u201cprimitive territorial machine\u201d is no longer enough to address the disorder brought about by capitalist \u00adglobalization, the \u201cdespotic machine\u201d establishes an over-encoding: \u201cIn producing itself capitalism creates a tremendous schizophrenic charge on which it puts all the weight of repression but which continually reproduces itself as the limit of such a process.\u201d This is why the question of \u00adrepression is tied to the development of a capitalism which oscillates between the two extremes of a liberation of flows and a great, over-encoding unity which makes it possible to control them: \u201cde-territorialization and \u00adre-\u00adterritorialization,\u201d schizophrenia and paranoia.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Paranoia is thus not only a mental pathology which affects some individuals; it is also a form of social thought fed by the uncertainty and distress of modernity. In his work on McCarthyism, the \u00adhistorian Richard Hofstadter identifies the principal features of this feeling of \u00adcollective \u00adpersecution, which he calls \u201cparanoid style.\u201d7<\/sup><\/a><\/span> 7 <\/a> - Richard Hofstadter, The Paranoid Style in American Politics and Other Essays<\/em> (New York: Random House, 1967), 4.<\/span> According to the \u00adanthropologist George Marcus, the crisis in representation following the end of the Cold War contributed to the development of this paranoid style.8<\/sup><\/a><\/span> 8 <\/a> - George E. Marcus and Michael G. Powell, \u201cFrom Conspiracy Theories in the Incipient New World Order of the 1990s to Regimes of Transparency Now,\u201d Anthropological Quarterly<\/em> 76 no. 2 (2003): 323-34.<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n The desire for security is even stronger in that we have fantasized about the calling into question of global capitalism embodied by the World Trade Center towers. Significantly, the day after the attacks, we were all \u201cAmericans.\u201d Jean Baudrillard immediately grasped the logic of this \u00adreaction: \u201cThe fact that we have dreamt of this event, that every one \u00adwithout exception has dreamt of it\u2014because no one can avoid \u00addreaming of the destruction of any power that has become hegemonic to this degree\u2014is unacceptable to the Western moral conscience. Yet it is a fact, and one which can indeed be measured by the emotive violence of all that has been said and written in the effort to dispel it.\u201d9<\/sup><\/a><\/span> 9 <\/a> - Jean Baudrillard, The Sprit of Terrorism and Other Essays<\/em>, trans. Chris Turner (London\/New York: Verso, 2003 [2002]), 5.<\/span> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Since 2001, in light of the creation of an international coalition against terrorism and of the security measures that have been put in place, we have all become, effectively, potential terrorists. This at least is what the state appears to be telling us through the surveillance systems it has put in place from one end of the world to the other to \u201cprotect\u201d us. Six years later, in view of the results obtained, it is difficult not to think that the targets of these security measures were the democratic guarantees of our freedom and not Islamic fundamentalists, who have all too clearly obtained what they were after.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As Baudrillard remarks, \u201cThe repression of terrorism spirals around as unpredictably as the terrorist act itself. No one knows where it will stop, or what turnabouts there may yet be. . . . And it is this uncontrollable unleashing of reversibility that is terrorism\u2019s true victory. A victory that is visible in the subterranean ramifications and infiltrations of the event\u2014not quite in the direct economic, political, financial slump in the whole of the system\u2014and the resulting moral and psychological downturn\u2014but in the slump of the value system, in the whole ideology of freedom, of free circulation, and so on, on which the Western world prided itself, and on which it drew to exert its hold over the rest of the world.\u201d10<\/sup><\/a><\/span> 10 <\/a> - Ibid.<\/em>, 31-2.<\/span> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Terrorists are not idiots; they know very well that their actions will unleash repression that will surpass by far their own disruptive \u00admethods, but this serves their interests, because state violence justifies their struggle after the fact and swells the ranks of their troops. The repression of terrorism only serves to meet the terrorists\u2019 secret injunctions. What a symbolic victory for the power of Good! We are faced with a perverse act of masochism: terrorist martyrs expose the true nature of state power by leading it into a downward spiral of violence. It is inevitably \u00adcounter-\u00adproductive to meet violence with violence, because by embarking on the so-called \u201cwar on terror\u201d (which is already a contradiction of terms), George W. Bush is objectively playing bin Laden\u2019s game.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The state takes advantage of the continued presence of terrorism whenever its power and legitimacy are weakened.11<\/sup><\/a><\/span> 11 <\/a> - Zygmunt Bauman, Le pr\u00e9sent liquide. Peurs sociales et obsession s\u00e9curitaire<\/em> (Paris: Seuil, 2007), 26. <\/span> This is so apparent that some writers have developed conspiracy theories which call into question the role of certain political groups or even certain sectors of the state apparatus, such as the secret intelligence services. This is not \u00adentirely without foundation, because we know that the police and the army, at \u00advarious times in various places, have been able to carry out \u00adso\u2011called counter-insurgency techniques. The fact is that terrorist attacks, in the end, serve the policies put in place by the authorities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In order to thwart this conspiratorial thinking, which deals a blow to all efforts to uncover the truth, it would undoubtedly be wiser to look at the rhetorical strategies of the representatives of political authorities, because they tell us much more about the business of terror than \u00adterrorist networks themselves and imaginary plots to seize power. In the end, it doesn\u2019t matter whether or not hidden structures capable of putting in place perverse strategies exist when political manipulations of terrorist violence are so evident. There\u2019s no need to take up conspiracy theories when the newspapers describe another form of coercive violence, one less sensational but just as effective: social control.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Fear mongering is also part of a perverse strategy. For Pier Paolo Pasolini, the political use that the Christian Democrats made of the fear of terrorism to reinforce social control in Italy in the 1970s was a \u201cnew fascism.\u201d12<\/sup><\/a><\/span> 12 <\/a> - Pier Paolo Pasolini, \u201cL\u2019articlolo delle lucciole\u201d (1 February 1975), Scritti corsari <\/em>(N.p.: Garzanti, 1990), 128-34.<\/span> Indeed politicians behave exactly like little Mafiosi when they offer to \u201cprotect\u201d us against a danger that they themselves have helped create. Politicians aren\u2019t necessarily interested in dissipating our fears by privileging \u201ctransparency.\u201d On the contrary, their media campaigns help feed people\u2019s uncertainties and paranoia. Some of them have become masters of the art of confusion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n While anthropologists in the United States are quite happy to study forms of paranoia in the general population, they rarely \u00adanalyse the \u00adconception of power underlying such paranoia and even more rarely the performance of the elites who invoke more and more each day \u201c\u00adtransparency\u201d in the exercise of democratic power. George Marcus believes that it would be more productive to examine the connection between transparency and conspiracy in the new world order.13<\/sup><\/a><\/span> 13 <\/a> - George E. Marcus and Michael G. Powell, op. cit.<\/em>, 233.<\/span> <\/p>\n\n\n\n The political use of the fear of terrorism recalls the Mafia\u2019s logic of \u00adterror when it seeks to maintain order and omert\u00e0<\/em>. Some of those who study the Mafia say that it is a true totalitarian system.14<\/sup><\/a><\/span> 14 <\/a> - Leonardo Sciascia, La Sicile comme m\u00e9taphore<\/em> (Paris: Stock, 1979), 50.<\/span> The art of \u00adconfusion is not only carried out, it is also staged. Can we ignore this dimension of power? False conspiracies de-legitimize the true ones. From this point of view, we have to think of the conspiracy theory as a \u00adpolitical weapon: it makes it possible to recreate cohesiveness out of fear of being either suspected of enemy sympathies or accused of indulging in \u00adconspiracy theories. The resulting self-censorship rectifies any deviation which would threaten the system\u2019s fragile equilibrium.<\/p>\n\n\n\n We must, in fact, come to see terrorism and its repression as a \u00adtwo-faced Janus: each feeds the other and the terror under which we suffer in our day-to-day lives grows accordingly. In Michael Moore\u2019s film Fahrenheit 9\/11<\/em> (2004), there is suggestion of links, whose exact nature is not revealed, between the Bush and bin Laden families. In a moment of parody in the Wachowski brothers\u2019 film V for Vendetta<\/em> (2006), the terrorist and the media dictator have one and the same face. This strange amalgam bears a truth: in the case of terrorism, the important thing is not the terrorist act itself but its media exposure. In this case, we no longer know who is \u00adserving whom. Media frenzies create confusion. The lucubration which results from these staggering acts is a part of this: the conspiracy theories surrounding acts of terrorism are a part of the business of terror. They serve the political interests which confront each other around the event. It is quite significant that no attempt is made to dissipate the conspiratorial mindset. In conditions such as these, how can we be surprised to see the reappearance of the \u201cdespotic machines\u201d of paranoia? <\/p>\n\n\n\n [Translated from the French by Timothy Barnard]<\/p>\n\n\n![\"Solakov\"](\"https:\/\/esse.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/61_DO01_Dematteo_Solakov_55-scaled.jpg\")
Fears #55<\/em>, 2006-2007.
Photo: Angel Tzvetanov, courtesy of
Arndt & Partner, Berlin & Zurich<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n![\"Nedko-Solakov\"](\"https:\/\/esse.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/61_DO01_Dematteo_Solakov_94-scaled.jpg\")
Fears #94<\/em>, 2006-2007.
Photo: Angel Tzvetanov, courtesy of
Arndt & Partner, Berlin & Zurich<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n![\"Nedko-Solakov\"](\"https:\/\/esse.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/61_DO01_Dematteo_Solakov_84-scaled.jpg\")
Fears #84<\/em>, 2006-2007.
Photo: Angel Tzvetanov, courtesy of
Arndt & Partner, Berlin & Zurich<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n![\"Nedko-Solakov\"](\"https:\/\/esse.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/61_DO01_Dematteo_Solakov_85-scaled.jpg\")
Fears #85<\/em> & Fears #43<\/em>, 2006-2007.
Photos: Angel Tzvetanov, courtesy of
Arndt & Partner, Berlin & Zurich<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n![\"Nedko-Solakov\"](\"https:\/\/esse.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/61_DO01_Dematteo_Solakov_43-scaled.jpg\")
<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n